http://www.nbc10.com/news/9574663/detail.html

that's cause all photographers are cocksuckers

that's fucking bullshit, remember the good old days when we had rights?

HailTheLeaf said:

heh, I seem to still have rights.

Fuck Neffy in his stupid ass.

HailTheLeaf said:

Hah!!!
how old are you?
the good old days....pffffff.

CaptainCleanoff said:

Sweet, in that case, would you mind taping the cops with a cell phone tonight?

video is even better, you can see them using excessive force against civilians in action!

ShadowSD said:

Na, cannot do that because "the man" or "big brother" will hunt me down.

Shit like this is why the ACLU is so fucking necessary.

Also, Harry Hairston is the best name ever.

HailTheLeaf said:



Yeah, and all cops are like that right? There are always assholes in every situation, every occupation, every country. Were you around for the Rodney King shit? It sucked it happened, it was caught on film, but so was Reginald Dennys' beating. Nobody seemed to really care when a bunch of rampaging thugs nearly killed him. I do not like cops, but they are not all like that. Some of us on this board have to admit that we have gotten away with shit due to a "cool" cop now and then More than likely not wanting to do his job. HTL, you would have been great in the 60's as an activist but most of your points are so one sided nobody really gives a shit, but you are fun to argue with. And Powerkok, you are right the good ol' days? really, how old are you HTL?

Josh_Martin said:


I am not taking a shot at you Josh, you have better arguements than HTL the modern useless hippy big time, but how do you feel about the ACLU defending neo-nazis and shit like that? Honestly, just curious.

I'm questionable about this... And I'll tell ya why. The kid in it says one thing, and the cops are saying something else. The kid says he was on his property, the cops say he wasn't. The article itself is a little one-sided. Its all about what the kid and the ACLU says, and one paragraph about that the cops said. I'm not saying it didn't happen that way, just there's a good chance he did something else wrong here.

CaptainCleanoff said:

as much as i dont agree with neo-nazis (even moreso that they were born in the shallow end of the gene pool), they have a right as americans to have these thoughts. the ACLU seems a bit fishy in a lot of things. i got a hunch that they're controlled opposition, much like binladen is supposed to be "anti-american" but its the american govt which made him everything he is.

ct borderpatrol said:

I like the cut of yer jib fucka. Good point. If Hitler and Stalin were alive they would be backed by these fuckers. Ehhh, whatever. Good times, who is getting me a drink!?

Fuck the story. Whats up with the guido stache?

jealous much?

You completely missed the point.
The ACLU were not supporting the nazis or NAMBLA. Just their right to speak out about their beliefs. Free speech only works if its for EVERYONE, not just those you agree with.
I don't understand why so many people couldn't see that.

Josh_Martin said:


I see that, which is sad for them. thank you for making a valid point though.
All I wanted.

wan't that guy in a block of ice in timesquare for like 3 weeks?

I think it's funny that people that are all for the "american way" and "liberty" condem a man who is just taking pictures FROM HIS OWN PROPERTY. I don't like the idea of people being able to stop me from doing things that are perfectly legal: re me getting chases on lansdown st last saturday for shooting pictures of the bouncers at a bar taking down some bitch.

once again, photographer's rights:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/and...kantor/2005-12-29-camera-laws_x.htm
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf

The pigs hate it when they get caught doing something illegal and they will go to great lengths to keep the evidence from getting out.
Landsdown St. bouncers are wannabe pigs.

DEATH TO AMERICA!!!

JIHAD!!!