New site? Maybe some day. Username: SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F) Message: UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop Select Color orange orange-red crimson red firebrick dark red green limegreen teal silver sea-green deeppink tomato coral purple indigo burlywood sandy brown sienna chocolate FONTXXSmallXSmallSmallMediumLargeXLXXL :DG: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Char† ‡ ‰ ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦ ‾ ← ↑ → ↓ ™ – —   ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ § ¨ © ª « ¬ ­ ® ¯ ° ± ² ³ ´ µ ¶ · ¸ ¹ º » ¼ ½ ¾ ¿ À Á Â Ã Ä Å Æ Ç È É Ê Ë Ì Í Î Ï Ð Ñ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö × Ø Ù Ú Û Ü Ý Þ ß à á â ã ä å æ ç è é ê ë ì í î ï ð ñ ò ó ô õ ö ÷ ø ù ú û ü ý þ ÿ b i u  add: url  image  video(?) : post by largefreakatzero at 2012-12-20 19:37:06 Boozegood said [orig][quote] ShadowSD said [orig][quote] So you guys are arguing that a pistol could fire off as many accurate deadly shots in as short of a time as a Bushmaster? Yes, because it's a fact. Stop saying 'Bushmaster' when you are referring to a type of rifle (the type you are referring to as-to-be-determined as far as I can tell, though...) as well. Haha, there's so many companies right now that make a .223 on an AR platform. I like how the liberal media just picked up on "Bushmaster " and ran with it. Retards.

[default homepage]

[print][

4:35:41pm May 25,2024 load time 0.00845 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]