New site? Maybe some day. Username: SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F) Message: UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop Select Color orange orange-red crimson red firebrick dark red green limegreen teal silver sea-green deeppink tomato coral purple indigo burlywood sandy brown sienna chocolate FONTXXSmallXSmallSmallMediumLargeXLXXL :DG: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Char† ‡ ‰ ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦ ‾ ← ↑ → ↓ ™ – —   ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ § ¨ © ª « ¬ ­ ® ¯ ° ± ² ³ ´ µ ¶ · ¸ ¹ º » ¼ ½ ¾ ¿ À Á Â Ã Ä Å Æ Ç È É Ê Ë Ì Í Î Ï Ð Ñ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö × Ø Ù Ú Û Ü Ý Þ ß à á â ã ä å æ ç è é ê ë ì í î ï ð ñ ò ó ô õ ö ÷ ø ù ú û ü ý þ ÿ b i u  add: url  image  video(?) : post by Murph at 2006-05-21 23:48:16 Dan Brown borrowed his premise from Holy Blood and Holy Grail, but that book was not only discredited by its authors (although their study of christian history was captivating) and an amazing book by Clive Prince called the Templar Revelation (which Brown raped) because of their reliance on the greatest hoa artist on Earth since DaVinci, a man named Pierre PLantard. I agree the movie will open people up to different ideas, but its about as wrong as Christianity itself. At least alternate views of history can be shared because Christianity suppressed and destroyed so much thought and experience from our human past, and this is why I hate it. But I love me a good fable.

[default homepage]

[print][

8:22:42pm May 19,2024 load time 0.00620 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]